JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 1, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Maria Gladys Varela Florez

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto De Febrero 4 De 2005, Proferido Por La Magistrada Sustanciadora En El Proceso De La Referencia, Doctora Clara Ines Vargas Hernández, Que Rechazo La Demanda. Confirmar El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional para conocer demanda contra decreto reglamentario
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto proferido por la Magistrada Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez el cuatro ( 4 ) de febrero de 2005, por medio del cual se rechazo la demanda instaurada por la ciudadana Maria Gladys Varela Florez.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.